Fear Morality
Fear and Morality in Nietzsche
Nietzsche believed that there was no real ethic and that since there was no moral without fear, that there were no true morals. The problem with this is how he developed this idea. This paper first breaks down how Nietzsche theorized morality, and then gives two cases to refute his assertions.
Nietzsche's Theory of Morality
From the beginning of his diatribe, Nietzsche shows that he has had a superior intellect from the time he was very young, and he is thus, the supposition has to be, uniquely qualified to judge ethics and morality. He wrote his very first treatise on morality at the "tender" age of thirteen (Nietzsche 1). His views of ethics were shaped by his method of questioning, determining answers, and then building more questions based on these answers, until, he says, "at last I had my own country, my own soil, a totally secluded, flowering, blooming world, a secret garden" (Nietzsche 1). Out of this secluded world he built the frame for his beliefs concerning ethics.
This is not to say that everything that Nietzsche said was wrong. His basic stance is that of "the victor makes the history." He believed that there was no ethic, no morality and no truly discernible good because these had all been determined by the ruling and intellectual, the aristocratic, class. Ethics were the ones set up by those who ruled, so, of course, they would set the ethic as one in which they were right in their actions rather than what is truly, universally thought of as good. His argument can even be...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now